wire assignment in Verilog
I have a question while studying Verilog. Let’s say there is a signal called input A;
and there is a signal called wire [15:0] B;
where assign B[15:0] = {8{A}};
Is it possible to create task within interface for specific modport?
I want to create an interface for AXI-stream with tasks for testbench for sending and receiving data. As far as I understand I have some issues with task visibility in the interface.
Does the SystemVerilog standard allows mixing with Verilog files?
Does the SystemVerilog standard permit to mix SystemVerilog files (.sv
) with Verilog files (.v
)?
Why am I not getting output after pass through design in testbench module driver and monitor?
Here is my design and testbench environment code.
Why am I not getting output after pass through design in testbench module driver and monitor?
Here is my design and testbench environment code.
Why am I not getting output after pass through design in testbench module driver and monitor?
Here is my design and testbench environment code.
Default value of wire is Z, but in first instantiation it is taking 0. How this is possible?
`include “fa.v” module FAn(a,b,s,c); parameter size=4; input [size-1:0]a; input [size-1:0]b; output reg [size-1:0]s; output c; wire [size:0] cin; genvar i; for(i=0;i<size;i=i+1)begin FA(.a(a[i]),.b(b[i]),.cin(cin[i]),.s(s[i]),.c(cin[i+1])); end assign c=cin[size]; endmodule Here in instantiation line: FA(.a(a[i]),.b(b[i]),.cin(cin[i]),.s(s[i]),.c(cin[i+1])); in first iteration, I am passing cin[0] signal (cin(cin[0])). Since I haven;t assigned any value to wire[size:0]cin, cin[0] default value should be “z” right, […]
Output not updated as expected
I have been playing with Verilog, and I am just starting. I have implemented several logic gates from NAND which are working, but now I have hit a dead-end when trying to perform on OR on several bits.
What is `+:` and `-:`?
What are the +:
and -:
Verilog/SystemVerilog operators? When and how do you use them? For example:
Why does blocking vs. non-blocking matter in this Verilog snippet?
I am trying to get a handle of how simulators treat delay control (via #<delay>
) and I am unable to explain the observed difference in the following two snippets: