Java default Integer value is int

My code looks like this

Alternatives to type casting in your domain

In my Domain I have an entity Activity which has a list of ITasks. Each implementation of this task has it’s own properties beside the implementation of ITask itself. Now each operation of the Activity entity (e.g. Execute()) only needs to loop over this list and call an ITask method (e.g. ExecuteTask()).

C++ Typecasting VS performance

Let’s say we’re designing a video game. We have some sprites on the map and we want to call some method of the particular sprite at some particular position.

implement cons function in Java – type safety question

I am working on a small functional library written in Java, which mimics the a functional style of programming. I am stuck with a undesirable type cast in one of my method definitions and would love some help.

Boolean-Integer Typecasting to Replace Conditional [closed]

Closed 9 years ago.

Type parameterized methods to avoid casting

In a library I am developing I have a factory method that looks a bit like:

Loose typing not applied to objects

I have very little experience working with classes and object. I work in a loosely typed language, PHP.

When is type coercion a good idea?

When do you want (on purpose) to coerce type in JavaScript? I mean, beyond comparing strings and numbers, when does it benefit something you’re building?

When is type coercion a good idea?

When do you want (on purpose) to coerce type in JavaScript? I mean, beyond comparing strings and numbers, when does it benefit something you’re building?

When is type coercion a good idea?

When do you want (on purpose) to coerce type in JavaScript? I mean, beyond comparing strings and numbers, when does it benefit something you’re building?