Does Microsoft still have C++ container limitations when passing to DLLs? [duplicate]
This question already has answers here: Did C++11 address concerns passing std lib objects between dynamic/shared library boundaries? (ie dlls and so)? (3 answers) Closed 9 years ago. Microsoft has had a fair amount of trouble in the past when passing STL containers like string and vector pointers and references to DLLs. See, for example, […]
Does Microsoft still have C++ container limitations when passing to DLLs? [duplicate]
This question already has answers here: Did C++11 address concerns passing std lib objects between dynamic/shared library boundaries? (ie dlls and so)? (3 answers) Closed 9 years ago. Microsoft has had a fair amount of trouble in the past when passing STL containers like string and vector pointers and references to DLLs. See, for example, […]
Does Microsoft still have C++ container limitations when passing to DLLs? [duplicate]
This question already has answers here: Did C++11 address concerns passing std lib objects between dynamic/shared library boundaries? (ie dlls and so)? (3 answers) Closed 9 years ago. Microsoft has had a fair amount of trouble in the past when passing STL containers like string and vector pointers and references to DLLs. See, for example, […]
Why are there so many “…_impl” and “…_base” classes in the C++ STL implementation?
Why are there so many “…_impl” and “…_base” classes in the C++ STL implementation? At the same time, many of these classes are not necessary to reuse, and this is not pimpl.
Why not implement it directly, but add another layer like this?
Thank you for your answers.