Using empty subclasses to add to the semantics of a class hierarchy?
I was wondering whether using (almost) empty derived classes to give additional semantics to a class hierarchy was a good idea (or practice) ?
Why would one bother marking up properly and semantically?
Note that I (try) to mark up as semantically as possible because I like they way it looks and feels, but not because I’m aware of any other stunning advantages. The point of my question is to be able to educate others
What is meant by a “First Class Protocol”
The Node.js about page describes HTTP as being a “first class protocol” within node.js. What does this mean?
Using ‘new’ in a projection?
I wish to project a collection from one type (Something) to another type (SomethingElse). Yes, this is a very open-eneded question, but which of the two options below do you prefer?
What is the right HTTP method for upvoting?
From a RESTful point of view, what is the most appropriate HTTP method for the action of upvoting a forum post (like on StackExchange)?
What is the difference between a server and a mainframe? [closed]
Closed 11 years ago.
Should semantic breaking changes be tied to syntactic breaking changes?
Explanation
Objective C – nested messages … confusion about
Wonder if anyone could shed some light on this messaging construct:
Objective C – nested messages … confusion about
Wonder if anyone could shed some light on this messaging construct:
Difference between sending a message and emitting it
Halfway through the RabbitMQ tutorial, I noticed that the tutorial stops referring to producers “sending” messages and starts using the verb “emit” instead — and pretty consistently, too; after the second tutorial, the verb “send” is no longer used to describe a producer transmitting messages.