Why are string resources generally kept external to the code and not inside the code?
Generally, on many platforms, I’m writing my string resources to a .resx or .xml file, and then I’m getting them using some platform-dependent approach.
Android DB With Some Multi-Language Data
I have a SQLite Database in my Android app with a “Question” table, among others. That table contains “default” or “pre-loaded” data (in this case the questions asked by the app).
Android DB With Some Multi-Language Data
I have a SQLite Database in my Android app with a “Question” table, among others. That table contains “default” or “pre-loaded” data (in this case the questions asked by the app).
Android DB With Some Multi-Language Data
I have a SQLite Database in my Android app with a “Question” table, among others. That table contains “default” or “pre-loaded” data (in this case the questions asked by the app).
Structuring Resource Files
In .NET we’ve got Resource files which are great for allowing providing translations across your application.
To include a resource ID in the payload or to derive from URI
Designing an API, we’ve come up against the question of whether a PUT payload should contain the ID of the resource being updated.
What is the correct answer of given problem?
Consider a system having m resources of same type and 3 process A,B and C have peak demands of 3,4 and 6 respectiveley.
What’s the proper name for the type of security where we secure resources by ownerrship?
I work on a REST API that mixes two types of security:
How do you find out what resources are unmanaged?
Looking through the .NET documentation, specifically the WebRequest class, I don’t see any information indicating that I should wrap an instantiation of it in a using statement. Even the provided example does not do this. In most examples online however, this is exactly what’s done.
How do you find out what resources are unmanaged?
Looking through the .NET documentation, specifically the WebRequest class, I don’t see any information indicating that I should wrap an instantiation of it in a using statement. Even the provided example does not do this. In most examples online however, this is exactly what’s done.