Storing a pointer to an argument passed by (non-const) reference
When designing an interface for passing objects which are meant to be stored for later use and which should not be ‘null’, I am always a bit uncertain if the argument should be passed by reference or as a pointer.
Storing a pointer to an argument passed by (non-const) reference
When designing an interface for passing objects which are meant to be stored for later use and which should not be ‘null’, I am always a bit uncertain if the argument should be passed by reference or as a pointer.
Storing a pointer to an argument passed by (non-const) reference
When designing an interface for passing objects which are meant to be stored for later use and which should not be ‘null’, I am always a bit uncertain if the argument should be passed by reference or as a pointer.
What should I do in C++ when implementing a container class: storing objects by value or by reference?
I’m new to C++, coming from Java.
What should I do in C++ when implementing a container class: storing objects by value or by reference?
I’m new to C++, coming from Java.
What should I do in C++ when implementing a container class: storing objects by value or by reference?
I’m new to C++, coming from Java.
How is atomicity of reference operations enforced?
In managed languages how is atomicity of reference operations enforced?
Polymorphic template container: shared_ptr vs reference_wrapper
Assuming we have two classes:
Why does ORM persist() functionality use references to populate insert_id and not return?
My understanding of how ORM persist works: