Extracting lambda expressions from linq queries and readability

Every now and then when I have a complex lambda, I do something like this:

Extracting lambda expressions from linq queries and readability

Every now and then when I have a complex lambda, I do something like this:

Good or bad code? Or “a secret reason”?

I think this code:

Good or bad code? Or “a secret reason”?

I think this code:

Good or bad code? Or “a secret reason”?

I think this code:

C# readability – async/await or return for wrapping asynchronous functions?

Say I have an asynchronous method:

Why don’t programming languages or IDEs support attaching descriptive metadata to variables?

As developers, we often face the challenge of balancing meaningful variable names with code readability. Long, descriptive names can make code harder to read, while short names may lack context. For example:

Message when launching quanteda.textstats and error in runningFlesch’s Reading Ease Score

I am new to quanteda and I have tried to get the Flesch’s Reading Ease Score readability index. I have 2 issues.

Why do many languages not support named parameters? [closed]

Closed 10 years ago.

Why do many languages not support named parameters? [closed]

Closed 10 years ago.