How to make Doxygen documentation that helps in understanding the code?
So a few years ago I came across a statement that most of the Doxygen generated documentation out there is quite bad. “Bad” in the sense that defies the purpose of documentation and doesn’t help in understanding the code. To an extent, I think this also applies to other automatic documentation generators.
How to make Doxygen documentation that helps in understanding the code?
So a few years ago I came across a statement that most of the Doxygen generated documentation out there is quite bad. “Bad” in the sense that defies the purpose of documentation and doesn’t help in understanding the code. To an extent, I think this also applies to other automatic documentation generators.
How to make Doxygen documentation that helps in understanding the code?
So a few years ago I came across a statement that most of the Doxygen generated documentation out there is quite bad. “Bad” in the sense that defies the purpose of documentation and doesn’t help in understanding the code. To an extent, I think this also applies to other automatic documentation generators.
Is it reasonable for a client to expect automated test scripts as project deliverables?
Our company is currently halfway through a software project with a consulting firm. As someone who will be taking ownership of the project after the consultants finish, is it reasonable for our company to ask the consultants to write automated test scripts and pass them on to us?
Is it reasonable for a client to expect automated test scripts as project deliverables?
Our company is currently halfway through a software project with a consulting firm. As someone who will be taking ownership of the project after the consultants finish, is it reasonable for our company to ask the consultants to write automated test scripts and pass them on to us?
In boundary-value analysis, why test min+1 along with min?
In boundary analysis testing, some authors suggest testing MIN-1, MIN, MIN+1 (and the same for MAX).
In boundary-value analysis, why test min+1 along with min?
In boundary analysis testing, some authors suggest testing MIN-1, MIN, MIN+1 (and the same for MAX).
In boundary-value analysis, why test min+1 along with min?
In boundary analysis testing, some authors suggest testing MIN-1, MIN, MIN+1 (and the same for MAX).
In boundary-value analysis, why test min+1 along with min?
In boundary analysis testing, some authors suggest testing MIN-1, MIN, MIN+1 (and the same for MAX).
Do I have to be a hardcore programmmer to succeed? [closed]
Closed 9 years ago.