Smart multiprocessing in Python
I have a function process_file
which takes a file name as input, processes the input, then saves the output.
Is it possible to skip initialization of __main__ module in Python multiprocessing?
It is common in python multiprocessing to use if __name__ == "__main__"
. However, if I know my child process does not need anything from __main__
module, can I remove this part? e.g.
Multiprocessing with multiple class objects
I have different python classes and all of them having a method called push. What I am trying to is
Populating a list instance in Multiprocessing BaseManager class
I’m trying to create a way to pass a dataclass object to several different child processes using the Multiprocessing module. Right now I’ve tried:
Python – Multiprocessing and variables handover to each call (but in external function)
I would like to enhance question from “/questions/78538034/in-python-how-do-i-pass-local-variable-values-to-multiprocessing-librarys-pool?noredirect=1#comment138458954_78538034”
Multiprocessing with python being slower than without
I have been trying to learn multiprocessing. I wanted to test my understanding by making a little program that would generate a list of random numbers. Then make two different methods to find the largest number in the list. The first method not using multiprocessing and the second using multiprocessing. However when I run the code the runtime is always hundreds of times slower when I use the multiprocessing code regardless of the length of the list.
Python – Multiprocessing and variables handover to each call
I have struggle with using multiprocessing lib in Python, where I want to use Pool.
Multiprocessing on windows
I am a new user. I have some problems when I set num_workers on windowns. I received the following notification
The Multiprocessing Pool runs the entire code from the beginning, not the passed function. How to fix it?
I am implementing a function to convert a document to a pdf file of my Pyside6 project. I managed to do, however the program runs sequentially instead of in parallel, which means I can speed up the conversion process. For this I am using mpire
with dill
, because pickle
can’t process something in the library I am using, but dill
managed to.
So, the problem is that when I run WorkerPool
, my program is executed from the beginning (start from main.py
) instead of the process_object_of_project_pages_objects()
function I specified. I don’t need this, because otherwise the code will generate errors related to the fact that initially the project for my program will not be selected, and therefore the database will not be created/selected (sqlite3.OperationalError: no such table: Project_pages_data
).
How terminates a python process with queues ? + Bug with size of queues?
I’m just starting out with multiprocessing in Python.
I use multiprocessing.queues
in my program that I pass from process to process.
The problem is that when I use myprocess.join()
, it only terminates when the queue I’m writing to is empty.
So I’m wondering what the reason is, why it’s built that way and how to get around it. I can empty all my queues in my main process, but I’d like it better.