Why is indexOfFirst() by reference equality slower than indexOf() by classes wrapping the value?
I found collections of items overriding equals() working slowly on indexOf() than ones not by almost 10 times.
Why is indexOfFirst() by reference equality slower than indexOf() by classes wrapping the value?
I found collections of items overriding equals() working slowly on indexOf() than ones not by almost 10 times.
Why is indexOfFirst() by reference equality slower than indexOf() by classes wrapping the value?
I found collections of items overriding equals() working slowly on indexOf() than ones not by almost 10 times.
Why is indexOfFirst() by reference equality slower than indexOf() by classes wrapping the value?
I found collections of items overriding equals() working slowly on indexOf() than ones not by almost 10 times.
Why is indexOfFirst() by reference equality slower than indexOf() by classes wrapping the value?
I found collections of items overriding equals() working slowly on indexOf() than ones not by almost 10 times.
Why is indexOfFirst() by reference equality slower than indexOf() by classes wrapping the value?
I found collections of items overriding equals() working slowly on indexOf() than ones not by almost 10 times.
Why is indexOfFirst() by reference equality slower than indexOf() by classes wrapping the value?
I found collections of items overriding equals() working slowly on indexOf() than ones not by almost 10 times.
Why is indexOfFirst() by reference equality slower than indexOf() by classes wrapping the value?
I found collections of items overriding equals() working slowly on indexOf() than ones not by almost 10 times.