I need help with my procedure (and code) that allocates, which is not the intention, more resources (income) whenever more than one operator is generated. The idea is that one owner is linked to one operator, and is paid a percentage share of net-fare collections, accounted as my-pay. This is the one that accumulates the operators income over a time. In case it is there, the owner is meant to receive a pre-specified remittance and any other remaining collections (termed as under-declaration).

I need help with my procedure (and code) that allocates, which is not the intention, more resources (income) whenever more than one operator is generated. The idea is that one owner is linked to one operator, and is paid a percentage share of net-fare collections, accounted as my-pay. This is the one that accumulates the operators income over a time. In case it is there, the owner is meant to receive a pre-specified remittance and any other remaining collections (termed as under-declaration).

I need help with my procedure (and code) that allocates, which is not the intention, more resources (income) whenever more than one operator is generated. The idea is that one owner is linked to one operator, and is paid a percentage share of net-fare collections, accounted as my-pay. This is the one that accumulates the operators income over a time. In case it is there, the owner is meant to receive a pre-specified remittance and any other remaining collections (termed as under-declaration).

I need help with my procedure (and code) that allocates, which is not the intention, more resources (income) whenever more than one operator is generated. The idea is that one owner is linked to one operator, and is paid a percentage share of net-fare collections, accounted as my-pay. This is the one that accumulates the operators income over a time. In case it is there, the owner is meant to receive a pre-specified remittance and any other remaining collections (termed as under-declaration).

I need help with my procedure (and code) that allocates, which is not the intention, more resources (income) whenever more than one operator is generated. The idea is that one owner is linked to one operator, and is paid a percentage share of net-fare collections, accounted as my-pay. This is the one that accumulates the operators income over a time. In case it is there, the owner is meant to receive a pre-specified remittance and any other remaining collections (termed as under-declaration).

I need help with my procedure (and code) that allocates, which is not the intention, more resources (income) whenever more than one operator is generated. The idea is that one owner is linked to one operator, and is paid a percentage share of net-fare collections, accounted as my-pay. This is the one that accumulates the operators income over a time. In case it is there, the owner is meant to receive a pre-specified remittance and any other remaining collections (termed as under-declaration).

I need help with my procedure (and code) that allocates, which is not the intention, more resources (income) whenever more than one operator is generated. The idea is that one owner is linked to one operator, and is paid a percentage share of net-fare collections, accounted as my-pay. This is the one that accumulates the operators income over a time. In case it is there, the owner is meant to receive a pre-specified remittance and any other remaining collections (termed as under-declaration).

I am trying to locate where the extensions are stored in NetLogo 6.4 (since version 6). Specifically, I need to extract the Table extension to use it with OpenMole.

I have my go function set to forever and I want to create a button that says stop to stop the simulation as i noticed that peers running the model dont press the go button again to stop it. However, the button with the stop primitive is not stoping the run.

Once trying to compare 30 lists and make an edge, if correlation is greater than 0.5, an error was detected at