Painfully Stupid Method Names in Legacy Code: Fix or Leave as Warning? [duplicate]
This question already has answers here: Best Practices for Renaming, Refactoring, and Breaking Changes with Teams (3 answers) Closed 11 years ago. For this case let’s assume something like… “removedNonPriceChangingConfermations” that is in no way relating to things that happened in the past tense, nor does it return a list of removed items (which you […]
Painfully Stupid Method Names in Legacy Code: Fix or Leave as Warning? [duplicate]
This question already has answers here: Best Practices for Renaming, Refactoring, and Breaking Changes with Teams (3 answers) Closed 11 years ago. For this case let’s assume something like… “removedNonPriceChangingConfermations” that is in no way relating to things that happened in the past tense, nor does it return a list of removed items (which you […]
Painfully Stupid Method Names in Legacy Code: Fix or Leave as Warning? [duplicate]
This question already has answers here: Best Practices for Renaming, Refactoring, and Breaking Changes with Teams (3 answers) Closed 11 years ago. For this case let’s assume something like… “removedNonPriceChangingConfermations” that is in no way relating to things that happened in the past tense, nor does it return a list of removed items (which you […]
Painfully Stupid Method Names in Legacy Code: Fix or Leave as Warning? [duplicate]
This question already has answers here: Best Practices for Renaming, Refactoring, and Breaking Changes with Teams (3 answers) Closed 11 years ago. For this case let’s assume something like… “removedNonPriceChangingConfermations” that is in no way relating to things that happened in the past tense, nor does it return a list of removed items (which you […]
Is there an explicit word for non-abstract class?
I got mainly abstract classes in my project and there are a few other class which are using/inheriting them. When I’m writing the documentation I would like to specify that a part of it is just about the behavior of these non-abstract classes, but I found using this word silly.
Is there an explicit word for non-abstract class?
I got mainly abstract classes in my project and there are a few other class which are using/inheriting them. When I’m writing the documentation I would like to specify that a part of it is just about the behavior of these non-abstract classes, but I found using this word silly.
Naming conventions for Java classes that have a static main method?
After reading gnat’s answer to Why a static main method in Java and C#, rather than a constructor? I take his answer to mean that the purpose of a Java class with a static main method is to define a program entry point and that it is not meant to be the program itself.
collection naming – singular or plural [closed]
Closed 9 years ago.
How important is to avoid name collisions between libraries belonging to different domains? [closed]
Closed 9 years ago.
How important is to avoid name collisions between libraries belonging to different domains? [closed]
Closed 9 years ago.