When we say a monad ‘encapsulates a computation’ – is this just saying ‘wraps a functional transformation of data’?
When I think of the word ‘computation’ – my mind jumps to lambda calculus or operations on a state machine representing a CPU. It is quite a broad definition.
When we say a monad ‘encapsulates a computation’ – is this just saying ‘wraps a functional transformation of data’?
When I think of the word ‘computation’ – my mind jumps to lambda calculus or operations on a state machine representing a CPU. It is quite a broad definition.
When we say a monad ‘encapsulates a computation’ – is this just saying ‘wraps a functional transformation of data’?
When I think of the word ‘computation’ – my mind jumps to lambda calculus or operations on a state machine representing a CPU. It is quite a broad definition.
When we say a monad ‘encapsulates a computation’ – is this just saying ‘wraps a functional transformation of data’?
When I think of the word ‘computation’ – my mind jumps to lambda calculus or operations on a state machine representing a CPU. It is quite a broad definition.
How is the UnitOfWork pattern related to Monadic programming?
Looking over the definition of the Unit of Work pattern it seems very much like what a programmer would get if they implemented a Monad such as an IO or Transaction Monad. What makes the unit of work concept fundamentally different from the use of a Monad? Assume that we are working in a language that has enough power to implement most common Monads fully and can implement a unit of work pattern similar to what you may find in Java or C#, especially one with a type system such as Scala’s or Haskell’s.
How is the UnitOfWork pattern related to Monadic programming?
Looking over the definition of the Unit of Work pattern it seems very much like what a programmer would get if they implemented a Monad such as an IO or Transaction Monad. What makes the unit of work concept fundamentally different from the use of a Monad? Assume that we are working in a language that has enough power to implement most common Monads fully and can implement a unit of work pattern similar to what you may find in Java or C#, especially one with a type system such as Scala’s or Haskell’s.
How is the UnitOfWork pattern related to Monadic programming?
Looking over the definition of the Unit of Work pattern it seems very much like what a programmer would get if they implemented a Monad such as an IO or Transaction Monad. What makes the unit of work concept fundamentally different from the use of a Monad? Assume that we are working in a language that has enough power to implement most common Monads fully and can implement a unit of work pattern similar to what you may find in Java or C#, especially one with a type system such as Scala’s or Haskell’s.
How is the UnitOfWork pattern related to Monadic programming?
Looking over the definition of the Unit of Work pattern it seems very much like what a programmer would get if they implemented a Monad such as an IO or Transaction Monad. What makes the unit of work concept fundamentally different from the use of a Monad? Assume that we are working in a language that has enough power to implement most common Monads fully and can implement a unit of work pattern similar to what you may find in Java or C#, especially one with a type system such as Scala’s or Haskell’s.
How is the UnitOfWork pattern related to Monadic programming?
Looking over the definition of the Unit of Work pattern it seems very much like what a programmer would get if they implemented a Monad such as an IO or Transaction Monad. What makes the unit of work concept fundamentally different from the use of a Monad? Assume that we are working in a language that has enough power to implement most common Monads fully and can implement a unit of work pattern similar to what you may find in Java or C#, especially one with a type system such as Scala’s or Haskell’s.