How can I prevent users from merging origin/X into Y in git?
Is it possible to force git to only merge remote tracking branches into the corresponding local branch? E.g. assume origin/X tracks X on origin and corresponds to local X and the same for origin/Y and Y. I want to prevent users to do git checkout Y; git merge origin/X. Is it possible? How?
What’s so difficult about SVN merges?
Possible Duplicate:
I’m a Subversion geek, why should I consider or not consider Mercurial or Git or any other DVCS?
On merging database records, constraint violation in the intermediate table of M2M
If you are merging two or more database records from table X, that have a many-to-many relationship with table Y, how should you solve the problem of records in intermediate table Z that would violate one or more constraints as a result of the merge? Do you simply discard them or break off the transaction?
Can we reduce confusion in line-based diff tools by annotating the code with some unique tokens?
Let’s say I have
Can we reduce confusion in line-based diff tools by annotating the code with some unique tokens?
Let’s say I have
Can we reduce confusion in line-based diff tools by annotating the code with some unique tokens?
Let’s say I have
Can we reduce confusion in line-based diff tools by annotating the code with some unique tokens?
Let’s say I have
Can we reduce confusion in line-based diff tools by annotating the code with some unique tokens?
Let’s say I have
Importance of diffing and merging for design specifications documentation
The context of this question is choosing tools for writing design specifications for software projects.
Importance of diffing and merging for design specifications documentation
The context of this question is choosing tools for writing design specifications for software projects.