Haskell build and artifact environment similar to Maven
I used to be a Java developer for a long time, but recently, I joined a Haskell team.
In the java world, if you have a large project,
with several teams working on it, a common approach is to use an artifact server such as Maven to ease and speed-up the development.
Numerous build tools, such as Ant, Maven, Gradle, can build the project and
upload a jar file to the artifact server that can be used by the rest of the team
without pain.
Therefore,
by splitting the project into smaller sub-projects, the build time is also drastically reduced.
Haskell build and artifact environment similar to Maven
I used to be a Java developer for a long time, but recently, I joined a Haskell team.
In the java world, if you have a large project,
with several teams working on it, a common approach is to use an artifact server such as Maven to ease and speed-up the development.
Numerous build tools, such as Ant, Maven, Gradle, can build the project and
upload a jar file to the artifact server that can be used by the rest of the team
without pain.
Therefore,
by splitting the project into smaller sub-projects, the build time is also drastically reduced.
Haskell build and artifact environment similar to Maven
I used to be a Java developer for a long time, but recently, I joined a Haskell team.
In the java world, if you have a large project,
with several teams working on it, a common approach is to use an artifact server such as Maven to ease and speed-up the development.
Numerous build tools, such as Ant, Maven, Gradle, can build the project and
upload a jar file to the artifact server that can be used by the rest of the team
without pain.
Therefore,
by splitting the project into smaller sub-projects, the build time is also drastically reduced.
Conventions for revision control with Maven/Jenkins
For a software project I am working on, we have a ‘dev => QA => production’ methodology. That is, we create a release candidate (deployed to Artifactory), give it to QA (deploy to QA systems and a QA backend/application server) who takes a week or so to look at it, and if they it’s ok, we make a production release.
Conventions for revision control with Maven/Jenkins
For a software project I am working on, we have a ‘dev => QA => production’ methodology. That is, we create a release candidate (deployed to Artifactory), give it to QA (deploy to QA systems and a QA backend/application server) who takes a week or so to look at it, and if they it’s ok, we make a production release.
Conventions for revision control with Maven/Jenkins
For a software project I am working on, we have a ‘dev => QA => production’ methodology. That is, we create a release candidate (deployed to Artifactory), give it to QA (deploy to QA systems and a QA backend/application server) who takes a week or so to look at it, and if they it’s ok, we make a production release.
Failed to execute goal com.amashchenko.maven.plugin:gitflow-maven-plugin:1.18.0:release-start
In my pipeline I am getting the following error
How can I let maven deploy to snapshot repo only classifier zip package (int) instead of 2 classifiers zip packages (dev and int)?
Using mvn clean deploy -Pint command, 2 zip files are systematically pushed to nexus snapshot repository: myapp-0.0.1-timestamp-2-dev.zip and myapp-0.0.1-timestamp-2-int.zip.
However, I aim to push only package with -int when I choose -Pint profile, and package with -dev when I choose -Pdev profile.Bellow how assembly plugin is configured with profiles:
Maven Build Cache Extension repeating cached steps
I’m trying to use the Maven Build Cache Extension to cache the results from one Maven command for use in another. For example:
What is the maven equivalent of sourceSets used in gradle?
I would like to extend the question further from here: Add multiple source test directories for tests