This question already has answers here: Why are cryptic short identifiers still so common in low-level programming? (11 answers) Are short abbreviated method/function names that don’t use full words bad practice or a matter of style? [duplicate] (13 answers) Closed 9 years ago. I understand that in the earlier days of computing, shorter method names […]

This question already has answers here: Why are cryptic short identifiers still so common in low-level programming? (11 answers) Are short abbreviated method/function names that don’t use full words bad practice or a matter of style? [duplicate] (13 answers) Closed 9 years ago. I understand that in the earlier days of computing, shorter method names […]

This question already has answers here: Why are cryptic short identifiers still so common in low-level programming? (11 answers) Are short abbreviated method/function names that don’t use full words bad practice or a matter of style? [duplicate] (13 answers) Closed 9 years ago. I understand that in the earlier days of computing, shorter method names […]

This question already has answers here: Why are cryptic short identifiers still so common in low-level programming? (11 answers) Are short abbreviated method/function names that don’t use full words bad practice or a matter of style? [duplicate] (13 answers) Closed 9 years ago. I understand that in the earlier days of computing, shorter method names […]

This question already has answers here: Why are cryptic short identifiers still so common in low-level programming? (11 answers) Are short abbreviated method/function names that don’t use full words bad practice or a matter of style? [duplicate] (13 answers) Closed 9 years ago. I understand that in the earlier days of computing, shorter method names […]