What’s the reason of choosing PascalCasing over camelCasing or vice versa from a programming language design POV?

I like both but I notice languages that use camelCasing for members sometimes need more adjustments when you want to edit your code. For example (in Python):

What’s the reason of choosing PascalCasing over camelCasing or vice versa from a programming language design POV?

I like both but I notice languages that use camelCasing for members sometimes need more adjustments when you want to edit your code. For example (in Python):

Would a “downcast if block” be a reasonable language feature?

Consider the following “if cast”:

Would a “downcast if block” be a reasonable language feature?

Consider the following “if cast”:

Would a “downcast if block” be a reasonable language feature?

Consider the following “if cast”:

Would a “downcast if block” be a reasonable language feature?

Consider the following “if cast”:

Would a “downcast if block” be a reasonable language feature?

Consider the following “if cast”:

Why is there no ‘subclasses-only’ access modifier in Java?

In Java, there are four available access modifiers for methods:

Should I feel “uncomfortable” using auto in C++? [duplicate]

We use auto where we don’t have a specific reason to mention the type
explicitly. “Specific reasons” include:

Should I feel “uncomfortable” using auto in C++? [duplicate]

We use auto where we don’t have a specific reason to mention the type
explicitly. “Specific reasons” include: