“every statement and declaration an expression that yields a value” why?
At the end of the answer to “Can I do ++x and x++ in Python?” on this page: http://norvig.com/python-iaq.html, you can read:
“every statement and declaration an expression that yields a value” why?
At the end of the answer to “Can I do ++x and x++ in Python?” on this page: http://norvig.com/python-iaq.html, you can read:
“every statement and declaration an expression that yields a value” why?
At the end of the answer to “Can I do ++x and x++ in Python?” on this page: http://norvig.com/python-iaq.html, you can read:
Could it be possible to add the integer type to the ECMAScript standard?
In JavaScript, every number you will ever use will always be represented with what C programmer would call a double
. The official type is I believe number
. If I recall correctly, that fact was mentioned by Google as a “fundamental” problem with JavaScript and one of the reason why they wanted to have clean break with Dart. Now, I can’t help but wonder :
Could it be possible to add the integer type to the ECMAScript standard?
In JavaScript, every number you will ever use will always be represented with what C programmer would call a double
. The official type is I believe number
. If I recall correctly, that fact was mentioned by Google as a “fundamental” problem with JavaScript and one of the reason why they wanted to have clean break with Dart. Now, I can’t help but wonder :
Could it be possible to add the integer type to the ECMAScript standard?
In JavaScript, every number you will ever use will always be represented with what C programmer would call a double
. The official type is I believe number
. If I recall correctly, that fact was mentioned by Google as a “fundamental” problem with JavaScript and one of the reason why they wanted to have clean break with Dart. Now, I can’t help but wonder :
In Java, why were protected members made accessible to classes of the same package?
From the official documentation…
In Java, why were protected members made accessible to classes of the same package?
From the official documentation…
In Java, why were protected members made accessible to classes of the same package?
From the official documentation…
What is the proper way to distinguish between keywords and identifiers?
I’m aware that most modern languages use reserved words to prevent things like keywords from being used as identifiers.