Is functional intellisense and code browsing more beneficial than the use of dependency injection containers
This question is really based on PHP, but could be valid for other dynamically typed, interpreted languages and specifically the methods of generating code insight and object browsing in development environments.
User interfaces for C function completion
In method call syntax in many object-oriented languages, the receiver object goes to the left of the method name, e.g. someObject.someMethod()
. This comes in handy when using an IDE with code completion/code assist/Intellisense; when the user types a method call expression, the receiver has already been typed, so the IDE can narrow down its method choices to apply to that receiver (at least in statically-typed languages).
User interfaces for C function completion
In method call syntax in many object-oriented languages, the receiver object goes to the left of the method name, e.g. someObject.someMethod()
. This comes in handy when using an IDE with code completion/code assist/Intellisense; when the user types a method call expression, the receiver has already been typed, so the IDE can narrow down its method choices to apply to that receiver (at least in statically-typed languages).
how to configure vscode workspace intellisense
I have a code base with a lot of different c source files in different folders. For projects we want to configure a project folder and reference different source folders from that project. I configured this using CMake and it al compiles fine. Also vscode shows me de code file I need for that project. But intellisense is not working.