Can someone help me understand this GPL license
I can’t understand the last line of this GPL license.
Redistributing BSD-licensed software?
Is it acceptable to distribute unmodified BSD-licensed software (pyglet) with GPL-licensed software I created? The BSD allows for sale of modified software, I know, but does it allow re-licensing of unmodified? Seems to defeat the purpose of having a license at all.
Choosing the right license for a testing framework
I’ve finished a first working, releasable version of a testing framework. Prior to release, I want to apply a proper license to it. Normally I’d choose something like GPLv3 but here I am pretty unsure. If I put the testing framework under GPLv3, does that mean users won’t be able to test their commercial applications without also putting them under the GPL? Would a license like the MIT be a better fit?
Confused on selling GPL. How is it consistent with this section?
(Written against GPLv2.)
Using a GPLv3 library in a freemium business model
I read several related questions about the use of GPLv3 in a commercial app but they don’t say anything about a freemium app. I would like to use a GPLv3 library in two apps, a free one (with limited features) and a paid one.
How does the GPL work in regards to languages like Dart which compile to other languages?
Google’s Dart language is not supported by any Web Browsers other than a special build of Chromium known as Dartium. To use Dart for production code you need to run it through a Dart->JavaScript compiler/translator and then use the outputted JavaScript in your web application.
Running software as a service using unmodified GPL(v2+) program as a core dependency: must the SaaS source code be released?
I’m designing a software as a service project which will only be accessed online. I may have a hard dependency on an executable which is covered by GNU GPL (v2 or later).
GPL – what is distribution?
An interesting point came up on another thread about alleged misappropriation of a GPL project. In this case the enterprise software was used by some large companies who essentially took the code, changed the name, removed the GPL notices and used the result.
Switching licenses, or cross licensing existing GNU GPL v3 software
I’m in the process of making a fork of GNU coreutils with a range of modifications. I’d like to release the result as an open-source project, but I’m not so much of a fan of GNU GPL as a license.
GPL licensed software installed on commercial hardware
Do vendors need to provide sources, at the customer’s request, for GPL licensed software installed on the hardware they sell?