What is an example of a continuation not implemented as a procedure?
An interesting discussion about the distinction between callbacks and continuations over on SO has prompted this question. By definition, a continuation is an abstract representation of the logic needed to complete a computation. In most languages this manifests as a one argument procedure to which you pass whatever value needs continued processing.
What is an example of a continuation not implemented as a procedure?
An interesting discussion about the distinction between callbacks and continuations over on SO has prompted this question. By definition, a continuation is an abstract representation of the logic needed to complete a computation. In most languages this manifests as a one argument procedure to which you pass whatever value needs continued processing.
What is an example of a continuation not implemented as a procedure?
An interesting discussion about the distinction between callbacks and continuations over on SO has prompted this question. By definition, a continuation is an abstract representation of the logic needed to complete a computation. In most languages this manifests as a one argument procedure to which you pass whatever value needs continued processing.
What is an example of a continuation not implemented as a procedure?
An interesting discussion about the distinction between callbacks and continuations over on SO has prompted this question. By definition, a continuation is an abstract representation of the logic needed to complete a computation. In most languages this manifests as a one argument procedure to which you pass whatever value needs continued processing.
What is an example of a continuation not implemented as a procedure?
An interesting discussion about the distinction between callbacks and continuations over on SO has prompted this question. By definition, a continuation is an abstract representation of the logic needed to complete a computation. In most languages this manifests as a one argument procedure to which you pass whatever value needs continued processing.
Why is “tight coupling between functions and data” bad?
I found this quote in “The Joy of Clojure” on p. 32, but someone said the same thing to me over dinner last week and I’ve heard it other places as well:
Why is “tight coupling between functions and data” bad?
I found this quote in “The Joy of Clojure” on p. 32, but someone said the same thing to me over dinner last week and I’ve heard it other places as well:
Why is “tight coupling between functions and data” bad?
I found this quote in “The Joy of Clojure” on p. 32, but someone said the same thing to me over dinner last week and I’ve heard it other places as well:
Multiple arguments in function call vs single array
I have a function that takes in a set of parameters, then applies to them as conditions to an SQL query. However, while I favored a single argument array containing the conditions themselves:
If the sleep time of a function at first time differs from the second time, but the output is the same, is it still a idempotent function?
For example, if the sleep time of a function would change after first execution but the output remains unchanged, e.g.: