generic chaining technique for overloaded method
A common operation in JavaScript is to replace an object method with a new one while still calling the original method. This is often done like this:
generic chaining technique for overloaded method
A common operation in JavaScript is to replace an object method with a new one while still calling the original method. This is often done like this:
Principles of an extensible data proxy
There is a growing industry now with more than 30 companies playing in the Backend-As-A-Service (BaaS) market.
Principles of an extensible data proxy
There is a growing industry now with more than 30 companies playing in the Backend-As-A-Service (BaaS) market.
Principles of an extensible data proxy
There is a growing industry now with more than 30 companies playing in the Backend-As-A-Service (BaaS) market.
Is there a term that’s kind of the opposite of ‘deprecated’ – that’s ‘in future major versions this thing will be required’
In terms of deprecation strategies, we can mark a value as deprecated and this can imply that ‘this thing exists now and should work, but in future major releases this thing may disappear and will break your code’.
Is there a term for this coding practice?
One of the incidental complexities of introducing features to an existing system is that the programmer often has to touch several areas of code that are not immediately adjacent. Over the long haul it can be unclear when looking at a bit of code that it pertains to another bit found elsewhere. It’s both ugly design and a maintenance hazard. One of the properties of superior code, in my book, is its ability to keep a concept localized in one place. Sometimes this is built in to an architecture up front making it easy to plug new features into a system.
Do thin fluent builder method chains have any need to be “extensible”?
In an environment where refactoring is difficult extensibility can be a life saver. However, this is no excuse to over engineer code.
Do thin fluent builder method chains have any need to be “extensible”?
In an environment where refactoring is difficult extensibility can be a life saver. However, this is no excuse to over engineer code.
Do thin fluent builder method chains have any need to be “extensible”?
In an environment where refactoring is difficult extensibility can be a life saver. However, this is no excuse to over engineer code.