Why doesn’t Haskell have a ‘format’ function for string interpolation?
I’m trying to use Shake and I stumbled upon the following problem: there’s no easy and convenient way to interpolate a string. I know about Text.Printf — it’s not what I’m looking for. The interpolation syntax I’m talking about is like this:
Why doesn’t Haskell have a ‘format’ function for string interpolation?
I’m trying to use Shake and I stumbled upon the following problem: there’s no easy and convenient way to interpolate a string. I know about Text.Printf — it’s not what I’m looking for. The interpolation syntax I’m talking about is like this:
Is it better expose a collection or an API to the collection?
Take for example the following:
Is it better expose a collection or an API to the collection?
Take for example the following:
Is it better expose a collection or an API to the collection?
Take for example the following:
Is it better expose a collection or an API to the collection?
Take for example the following:
Martin Fowler’s Refactoring book: switch statement is using other object’s data, why is that bad ? A deeper explanation is sought for.
In the code sample below the Rental object is using Movie’s fields to do a switch statement. Martin says : this is a bad idea but he does not give any deeper explanation as to why ?
Martin Fowler’s Refactoring book: switch statement is using other object’s data, why is that bad ? A deeper explanation is sought for.
In the code sample below the Rental object is using Movie’s fields to do a switch statement. Martin says : this is a bad idea but he does not give any deeper explanation as to why ?
Is eventual consistency a wrong solution for e-commerce applications?
I’m reading about eventual consistency in couchDB. I’m somewhat confused by the term and its consequences on an application.
“A well designed system is a testable system” [closed]
Closed 10 years ago.