How to manage accidental complexity in software projects
When Murray Gell-Mann was asked how Richard Feynman managed to solve so many hard problems Gell-Mann responded that Feynman had an algorithm:
Why doesn’t VB.NET allow unnamed, one-line objects to be used?
Why isn’t this allowed in VB.NET:
Why doesn’t VB.NET allow unnamed, one-line objects to be used?
Why isn’t this allowed in VB.NET:
Why doesn’t VB.NET allow unnamed, one-line objects to be used?
Why isn’t this allowed in VB.NET:
Why doesn’t VB.NET allow unnamed, one-line objects to be used?
Why isn’t this allowed in VB.NET:
Why doesn’t VB.NET allow unnamed, one-line objects to be used?
Why isn’t this allowed in VB.NET:
Why doesn’t VB.NET allow unnamed, one-line objects to be used?
Why isn’t this allowed in VB.NET:
Why doesn’t VB.NET allow unnamed, one-line objects to be used?
Why isn’t this allowed in VB.NET:
Pythonic design for controlling multiple devices through an I2C bus
I’m writing a piece of software in python that will communicate with a bunch of devices via an I2C bus. Each of these devices are going to need some sort of a module or class to handle the communication and data conversion in some sensible way. The operations that each of the device modules perform are drastically different.
Pythonic design for controlling multiple devices through an I2C bus
I’m writing a piece of software in python that will communicate with a bunch of devices via an I2C bus. Each of these devices are going to need some sort of a module or class to handle the communication and data conversion in some sensible way. The operations that each of the device modules perform are drastically different.