Relative Content

Tag Archive for default-values

Wrapper Auxiliary Method VS Default Arguments for Initialization: Pros/Cons

I have a class in which there are several methods that can act as an “entry point” to its private innards (or the “fruit” thereof).
Said functions might be called multiple times throughout a single “pipeline” as triggered by such an entry point, but only the first call should act as the actual entry point in that it performs a certain initialization action.
Similar use cases show up in situations that aren’t necessarily object oriented, of course (off the top of my head: wrappers of recursive functions which initialize something before the recursion itself begins).

How can DB and UI agree on default values?

I created a table in a Postgres database. I would like to create a form in a Java application to insert rows into that table. Certain fields have default values. What is the best way for the database and UI to agree on what the default values are? Also, what is the best way for the form to communicate the user’s intent regarding defaults to the database?

How can DB and UI agree on default values?

I created a table in a Postgres database. I would like to create a form in a Java application to insert rows into that table. Certain fields have default values. What is the best way for the database and UI to agree on what the default values are? Also, what is the best way for the form to communicate the user’s intent regarding defaults to the database?

How can DB and UI agree on default values?

I created a table in a Postgres database. I would like to create a form in a Java application to insert rows into that table. Certain fields have default values. What is the best way for the database and UI to agree on what the default values are? Also, what is the best way for the form to communicate the user’s intent regarding defaults to the database?

OOP best practice: Optional referenced-type parameter

I know in C#, by default, referenced type variables are passed by reference to a method. I have a function which sometimes I just need its return value and sometimes both return value and the changes on the input object are needed outside of the function.

OOP best practice: Optional referenced-type parameter

I know in C#, by default, referenced type variables are passed by reference to a method. I have a function which sometimes I just need its return value and sometimes both return value and the changes on the input object are needed outside of the function.

OOP best practice: Optional referenced-type parameter

I know in C#, by default, referenced type variables are passed by reference to a method. I have a function which sometimes I just need its return value and sometimes both return value and the changes on the input object are needed outside of the function.