Why isn’t there a next operation on enums?
In most popular programming languages like Java and C# there is a way to define enums, which are essentially datatypes with a fixed set of values, e.g. DayOfWeek.
Why isn’t there a next operation on enums?
In most popular programming languages like Java and C# there is a way to define enums, which are essentially datatypes with a fixed set of values, e.g. DayOfWeek.
Why isn’t there a next operation on enums?
In most popular programming languages like Java and C# there is a way to define enums, which are essentially datatypes with a fixed set of values, e.g. DayOfWeek.
Why isn’t there a next operation on enums?
In most popular programming languages like Java and C# there is a way to define enums, which are essentially datatypes with a fixed set of values, e.g. DayOfWeek.
Why isn’t there a next operation on enums?
In most popular programming languages like Java and C# there is a way to define enums, which are essentially datatypes with a fixed set of values, e.g. DayOfWeek.
How can a true Vector be implemented in Haskell?
How could a true Vector type be implemented in Haskell? In order for something to be a Vector, it has to be stored sequentially in memory, with O(1) random access. But Haskell hides its memory management, and its datatypes describe trees! So how could you express that kind of requirement?
Why are floats called “real numbers” in some languages?
Some programing languages, notably Pascal, have a type of numbers called “real”.
Why are floats called “real numbers” in some languages?
Some programing languages, notably Pascal, have a type of numbers called “real”.
Why are floats called “real numbers” in some languages?
Some programing languages, notably Pascal, have a type of numbers called “real”.
Is there a stricter strtoull() in any ubiquitous C library?
I want a function that will interpret a string as a strictly unsigned integer, failing when the string overflows, represents a negative number, or does not represent a number.