Same constructor signature with different semantics?
Occasionally, I’m confronted with the problem that I have to provide some constructors in order to initialize objects with different sets of data. These sets can be mathematically transformed into each other, for example:
Same constructor signature with different semantics?
Occasionally, I’m confronted with the problem that I have to provide some constructors in order to initialize objects with different sets of data. These sets can be mathematically transformed into each other, for example:
Same constructor signature with different semantics?
Occasionally, I’m confronted with the problem that I have to provide some constructors in order to initialize objects with different sets of data. These sets can be mathematically transformed into each other, for example:
Separation of Concerns, Data Access Layer
I was thinking about this earlier today and figured I would get some input on the matter. When I develop applications I would usually have the Data Access Layer on another project, incase it could be re-used elsewhere in a similar manner in the future but also to allow updating the DAL without updating the UI layer.
Uses of persistent data structures in non-functional languages
Languages that are purely functional or near-purely functional benefit from persistent data structures because they are immutable and fit well with the stateless style of functional programming.
ruby-idiomatic hashes vs arrays
So I am still fairly new to ruby, though I have noticed that it is very hard to create 2d-array and that hashes seem to be more of the go to data structure than arrays.
Comparing performance of different C++ self-made tree data structures
I have two tree data-structures that I made in C++ , and they give a response for range queries/point queries in that program. I am using Ubuntu. I need help in understanding the way to compare the performance of these two data structures (for answering the query in that program) in external memory. How can I do this?
Comparing performance of different C++ self-made tree data structures
I have two tree data-structures that I made in C++ , and they give a response for range queries/point queries in that program. I am using Ubuntu. I need help in understanding the way to compare the performance of these two data structures (for answering the query in that program) in external memory. How can I do this?
Comparing performance of different C++ self-made tree data structures
I have two tree data-structures that I made in C++ , and they give a response for range queries/point queries in that program. I am using Ubuntu. I need help in understanding the way to compare the performance of these two data structures (for answering the query in that program) in external memory. How can I do this?
Comparing performance of different C++ self-made tree data structures
I have two tree data-structures that I made in C++ , and they give a response for range queries/point queries in that program. I am using Ubuntu. I need help in understanding the way to compare the performance of these two data structures (for answering the query in that program) in external memory. How can I do this?