What is the difference between passing NULL vs. nullptr to a template parameter?
I’m dealing with a fairly uniform vendor-provided API, and would like to check — and handle — any failures in a unified fashion too. To that end, I wrote the following wrapper:
Creating Cartesian Product from Integer Range Template Argument
I am working with a third party library which provides a Numeric
class that must be templated with precision and scale arguments. Unfortunately, within the context of the library I am creating, the precision and scale is not known until runtime, so I need to create a runtime mapping of those values to their respective templated functions.
Creating Cartesian Product from Integer Range Template Argument
I am working with a third party library which provides a Numeric
class that must be templated with precision and scale arguments. Unfortunately, within the context of the library I am creating, the precision and scale is not known until runtime, so I need to create a runtime mapping of those values to their respective templated functions.
Creating Cartesian Product from Integer Range Template Argument
I am working with a third party library which provides a Numeric
class that must be templated with precision and scale arguments. Unfortunately, within the context of the library I am creating, the precision and scale is not known until runtime, so I need to create a runtime mapping of those values to their respective templated functions.
Creating Cartesian Product from Integer Range Template Argument
I am working with a third party library which provides a Numeric
class that must be templated with precision and scale arguments. Unfortunately, within the context of the library I am creating, the precision and scale is not known until runtime, so I need to create a runtime mapping of those values to their respective templated functions.
correct syntax to access a template variable specialization
assume a template variable in data.h:
Returning an optional from a templated conversion function
I would like to update conversion functions which have the following signatures:
Is it enough to have forward declaration of std::list to test whether a type T is std::list?
For compile time checker which tests whether a type T
is std::list
I’ve came up with this template: