can gpl code contain more restrictively licensed code? (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)
There is a wordpress theme I am modifying to create my own derived work. This original wordpress theme has the GPLv2 licence in it’s root directory, so I assume that the entire theme is GPL code.
Switching licenses, or cross licensing existing GNU GPL v3 software
I’m in the process of making a fork of GNU coreutils with a range of modifications. I’d like to release the result as an open-source project, but I’m not so much of a fan of GNU GPL as a license.
What am I allowed to do programmatically with pictures that have a Creative Commons “don’t modify” license
I’m working on a project that uses some icons that are under a Creative Commons license (ND) that forbids modification of the picture.
Automatic generate code: “derived work”?
For example, I’ve GPL software. I’m the author of this GPL software. This GPL software has, between its code, Doxygen comments. These Doxygen comments are written to generate a CC-BY-SA html page, in order to upload this generated documentation in my project website under CC-BY-SA license.
Best practices when forking code base
I have a question as to the proper best practices revolving forking code.
How to license my closed source & freeware (donation ware) – using creative commons?
After doing a bit of research about licensing my free software, I reached this:
Does using Creative Commons No-Derivatives license conflict with GitHub terms?
When a software project wants to use Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License that denies making derivatives, does it conflict GitHub terms of service clause F.1 that says:
Does using Creative Commons No-Derivatives license conflict with GitHub terms?
When a software project wants to use Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License that denies making derivatives, does it conflict GitHub terms of service clause F.1 that says:
Does using Creative Commons No-Derivatives license conflict with GitHub terms?
When a software project wants to use Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License that denies making derivatives, does it conflict GitHub terms of service clause F.1 that says:
Can I use a part of another program without having to give away my rights on my own code?
I’m currently making a game and want to use some textfiles (lists of names) that are covered under the GNU General Public License (or the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License). Do I have to release my whole game under one of these licenses if I only used these (relatively small) files in my game or is it just these files I have to keep licensed like that?