Do software licenses (ie, MIT) need to be included with the executable?
Whenever a software license reads:
How does copyrights apply to source code header files?
It seems I heard that header files are not considered copyrightable since they can only be written one way (like a list of ingredients or facts). So a header file for a specific DLL will always look the same when written in a given programming language. Unfortunately I can’t find any resources to back this up.
How does copyrights apply to source code header files?
It seems I heard that header files are not considered copyrightable since they can only be written one way (like a list of ingredients or facts). So a header file for a specific DLL will always look the same when written in a given programming language. Unfortunately I can’t find any resources to back this up.
How does copyrights apply to source code header files?
It seems I heard that header files are not considered copyrightable since they can only be written one way (like a list of ingredients or facts). So a header file for a specific DLL will always look the same when written in a given programming language. Unfortunately I can’t find any resources to back this up.
What is the proper copyright information? [closed]
Closed 10 years ago.
What is the proper copyright information? [closed]
Closed 10 years ago.
What is the proper copyright information? [closed]
Closed 10 years ago.
Citing Borrowed Code
If you borrow code from some source, it is probably best to cite it (like “adapted from [source]”). However, if you take let’s say you borrowed this function (example in C++):
Citing Borrowed Code
If you borrow code from some source, it is probably best to cite it (like “adapted from [source]”). However, if you take let’s say you borrowed this function (example in C++):
Citing Borrowed Code
If you borrow code from some source, it is probably best to cite it (like “adapted from [source]”). However, if you take let’s say you borrowed this function (example in C++):