What is “condition testing” (as defined by the ISTQB Syllabus) actually good for? [duplicate]
Compared to decision (branch) testing, which considers the entire
decision as a whole and evaluates the TRUE and FALSE outcomes in
separate test cases, condition testing considers how a decision is
made. Each decision predicate is made up of one or more simple
“atomic” conditions, each of which evaluates to a discrete Boolean
value. These are logically combined to determine the final outcome of
the decision. Each atomic condition must be evaluated both ways by the
test cases to achieve this level of coverage.
What is “condition testing” (as defined by the ISTQB Syllabus) actually good for? [duplicate]
Compared to decision (branch) testing, which considers the entire
decision as a whole and evaluates the TRUE and FALSE outcomes in
separate test cases, condition testing considers how a decision is
made. Each decision predicate is made up of one or more simple
“atomic” conditions, each of which evaluates to a discrete Boolean
value. These are logically combined to determine the final outcome of
the decision. Each atomic condition must be evaluated both ways by the
test cases to achieve this level of coverage.
What is “condition testing” (as defined by the ISTQB Syllabus) actually good for? [duplicate]
Compared to decision (branch) testing, which considers the entire
decision as a whole and evaluates the TRUE and FALSE outcomes in
separate test cases, condition testing considers how a decision is
made. Each decision predicate is made up of one or more simple
“atomic” conditions, each of which evaluates to a discrete Boolean
value. These are logically combined to determine the final outcome of
the decision. Each atomic condition must be evaluated both ways by the
test cases to achieve this level of coverage.
What is “condition testing” (as defined by the ISTQB Syllabus) actually good for? [duplicate]
Compared to decision (branch) testing, which considers the entire
decision as a whole and evaluates the TRUE and FALSE outcomes in
separate test cases, condition testing considers how a decision is
made. Each decision predicate is made up of one or more simple
“atomic” conditions, each of which evaluates to a discrete Boolean
value. These are logically combined to determine the final outcome of
the decision. Each atomic condition must be evaluated both ways by the
test cases to achieve this level of coverage.
How to layer if statements when order of logic is irrelevant?
Basically I have a series of logic in my website that can lead to 5 total outcomes. Basically two different if tests and then a catch all else statement.
What is the difference between if(” == $variable) and if($variable == ”) [duplicate]
This question already has answers here: if (‘constant’ == $variable) vs. if ($variable == ‘constant’) (5 answers) Closed 9 years ago. While using an ‘if’ statement to check whether a variable is an empty string or not we can write it in two ways i.e. if(” == $variable) and if($variable == ”). I want to […]
Ifology – how to write this statement better? [closed]
Closed 9 years ago.
Ifology – how to write this statement better? [closed]
Closed 9 years ago.
Ifology – how to write this statement better? [closed]
Closed 9 years ago.
How to avoid spaghetti code when I have a lot of conditions? [duplicate]
This question already has answers here: Approaches for checking multiple conditions? [duplicate] (3 answers) Closed 9 years ago. I have the following problem: An user can withdraw money from 2 payment systems (but the number of payment systems can change anytime in the future). If user has a trusted account on either of these payment […]