How to maintain encapsulation with composition in C++?
I am designing a class Master
that is composed from multiple other classes, A
, Base
, C
and D
. These four classes have absolutely no use outside of Master
and are meant to split up its functionality into manageable and logically divided packages. They also provide extensible functionality as in the case of Base
, which can be inherited from by clients.
Testing complex compositions
I have a rather large collection of classes which check and mutate a given data structure. They can be composed via the composition pattern into arbitrarily complex tree-like structures. The final product contains a lot of these composed structures.
Testing complex compositions
I have a rather large collection of classes which check and mutate a given data structure. They can be composed via the composition pattern into arbitrarily complex tree-like structures. The final product contains a lot of these composed structures.
In UML is it correct to have an association class with a composition or aggregation relationship?
An example of an association class is given here:
In UML is it correct to have an association class with a composition or aggregation relationship?
An example of an association class is given here:
In UML is it correct to have an association class with a composition or aggregation relationship?
An example of an association class is given here:
In UML is it correct to have an association class with a composition or aggregation relationship?
An example of an association class is given here:
How to replace inheritance with composition in this case?
I’ve recently read several articles about the advantages of the composition over inheritance. Their authors said that you can always replace inheritance with composition (to be precise, they say they don’t know such situations where it can’t be done). However, I can’t think how to do this in the following case:
What is the actual reason that locks (sentinels) in OO are hard to reason about? [closed]
Closed 9 years ago.
Is composition and aggregation really a type of association relationship?
From Wikipedia: