Inheritance vs ‘specification’ by fields
I’m currently reading ‘Head first design patterns’ and I already have a few questions on the first chapter of the book.
This chapter introduces the ‘prefer composition over inheritance’ design principle, by explaining the ‘Strategy-Pattern’. My question isn’t about the pattern, but rather about a more basic design decision in one of the examples:
Visitor only applicable when using the Composite pattern?
For a long time I’ve tried to get my head wrapped around the visitor pattern, and somehow this thing keeps being rather fuzzy to me.
Visitor only applicable when using the Composite pattern?
For a long time I’ve tried to get my head wrapped around the visitor pattern, and somehow this thing keeps being rather fuzzy to me.
Visitor only applicable when using the Composite pattern?
For a long time I’ve tried to get my head wrapped around the visitor pattern, and somehow this thing keeps being rather fuzzy to me.
Visitor only applicable when using the Composite pattern?
For a long time I’ve tried to get my head wrapped around the visitor pattern, and somehow this thing keeps being rather fuzzy to me.
Visitor only applicable when using the Composite pattern?
For a long time I’ve tried to get my head wrapped around the visitor pattern, and somehow this thing keeps being rather fuzzy to me.
Visitor only applicable when using the Composite pattern?
For a long time I’ve tried to get my head wrapped around the visitor pattern, and somehow this thing keeps being rather fuzzy to me.
How to maintain encapsulation with composition in C++?
I am designing a class Master
that is composed from multiple other classes, A
, Base
, C
and D
. These four classes have absolutely no use outside of Master
and are meant to split up its functionality into manageable and logically divided packages. They also provide extensible functionality as in the case of Base
, which can be inherited from by clients.
How to maintain encapsulation with composition in C++?
I am designing a class Master
that is composed from multiple other classes, A
, Base
, C
and D
. These four classes have absolutely no use outside of Master
and are meant to split up its functionality into manageable and logically divided packages. They also provide extensible functionality as in the case of Base
, which can be inherited from by clients.
How to maintain encapsulation with composition in C++?
I am designing a class Master
that is composed from multiple other classes, A
, Base
, C
and D
. These four classes have absolutely no use outside of Master
and are meant to split up its functionality into manageable and logically divided packages. They also provide extensible functionality as in the case of Base
, which can be inherited from by clients.