Verification for value of test standards
We are currently developing a concept for our tests standards. Up until now, we don’t have standards. All we do is to tell the developer to write tests. Now we have the following basic idea:
Verification for value of test standards
We are currently developing a concept for our tests standards. Up until now, we don’t have standards. All we do is to tell the developer to write tests. Now we have the following basic idea:
Verification for value of test standards
We are currently developing a concept for our tests standards. Up until now, we don’t have standards. All we do is to tell the developer to write tests. Now we have the following basic idea:
Should all classes have a default constructor as part of good coding convention
From the texts I have read so far, the conventions talk about organizing constructors, starting with the default, if any. I am wondering, should all classes have a default constructor anyway. This will at least help to create a simple instance of the class on the fly, without having to use a parameterized constructor, which itself may require additional imports for specific parameter type.
Should all classes have a default constructor as part of good coding convention
From the texts I have read so far, the conventions talk about organizing constructors, starting with the default, if any. I am wondering, should all classes have a default constructor anyway. This will at least help to create a simple instance of the class on the fly, without having to use a parameterized constructor, which itself may require additional imports for specific parameter type.
Should all classes have a default constructor as part of good coding convention
From the texts I have read so far, the conventions talk about organizing constructors, starting with the default, if any. I am wondering, should all classes have a default constructor anyway. This will at least help to create a simple instance of the class on the fly, without having to use a parameterized constructor, which itself may require additional imports for specific parameter type.
Should all classes have a default constructor as part of good coding convention
From the texts I have read so far, the conventions talk about organizing constructors, starting with the default, if any. I am wondering, should all classes have a default constructor anyway. This will at least help to create a simple instance of the class on the fly, without having to use a parameterized constructor, which itself may require additional imports for specific parameter type.
Is PHP “list()” language construct a bad convention?
PHP supports the list() language construct which, in short, allows you to return multiple values from a function and then attach them to different variable, eg:
Is PHP “list()” language construct a bad convention?
PHP supports the list() language construct which, in short, allows you to return multiple values from a function and then attach them to different variable, eg:
Is PHP “list()” language construct a bad convention?
PHP supports the list() language construct which, in short, allows you to return multiple values from a function and then attach them to different variable, eg: