Coding style (do more, then simplify) [duplicate]
This question already has answers here: Prototyping vs. Clean Code at the early stages (10 answers) When to refactor (9 answers) Closed 11 years ago. I’m a CS student and I have been coding for a few months shy of a year now, and I seem to have developed what I think may be a […]
Coding style (do more, then simplify) [duplicate]
This question already has answers here: Prototyping vs. Clean Code at the early stages (10 answers) When to refactor (9 answers) Closed 11 years ago. I’m a CS student and I have been coding for a few months shy of a year now, and I seem to have developed what I think may be a […]
A better approach to refactor code when doing A/B Testing
I’m asked to refactor my component code to support A/B Testing.
A better approach to refactor code when doing A/B Testing
I’m asked to refactor my component code to support A/B Testing.
A better approach to refactor code when doing A/B Testing
I’m asked to refactor my component code to support A/B Testing.
A better approach to refactor code when doing A/B Testing
I’m asked to refactor my component code to support A/B Testing.
A better approach to refactor code when doing A/B Testing
I’m asked to refactor my component code to support A/B Testing.
A better approach to refactor code when doing A/B Testing
I’m asked to refactor my component code to support A/B Testing.
Is it best to use “get” as a prefix for getters?
if I had a boolean (property) shouldAutoLogin is it better to name the getter getShouldAutoLogin or just shouldAutoLogin so that it reads more like English?
Is it best to use “get” as a prefix for getters?
if I had a boolean (property) shouldAutoLogin is it better to name the getter getShouldAutoLogin or just shouldAutoLogin so that it reads more like English?