Reference to a string literal
I read that string literals have static storage duration, does that mean that references to them are always valid? For example, is the following code safe:
Is this code incorrect, which I found in a C++ book?
As I am reading “Programming: Principles and Practices Using C++” book,
I tried the “The first classic program” as shown in this code:
Is this code incorrect, which I found in a C++ book?
As I am reading “Programming: Principles and Practices Using C++” book,
I tried the “The first classic program” as shown in this code:
Is this code incorrect which i found it in a C++ book?
As i am reading Programming: Principles and Practices Using C++ book i tried the “The first classic program” as shown in this code:
Is this code incorrect which i found it in a C++ book?
As i am reading Programming: Principles and Practices Using C++ book i tried the “The first classic program” as shown in this code:
Is this code incorrect which i found it in a C++ book?
As i am reading Programming: Principles and Practices Using C++ book i tried the “The first classic program” as shown in this code:
Function that accepts a callable and returns a different callable with the same signature
I’m trying to write a function that receives a callable object as a parameter and returns a modified version of that callable object.
std::nearbyint does not round to nearest while std::rint does [closed]
Closed last month.
Is the wording of C11 for inline functions strict?
This problem mainly concerns wording issues.
For inline functions and inline definitions, C11 describes them as follows:
What is the intention of the following words that appear in C11?
C11：6.5.2.2 p9: