Today I saw this code on Leetcode:

Today I saw this code on Leetcode:

Today I saw this code on Leetcode:

Today I saw this code on Leetcode:

Today I saw this code on Leetcode:

I will be given an array. It can be sorted or unsorted. If it is unsorted, my task it to check if I can swap two integers that make the array sorted. I read the array then I checked if the array is sorted or not, if it’s not, I made two integers. The first check the number which made the problem from the first and the second integer checks the number which made the problem from the end of the array, then I reversed the sub array from the index of the first integer to the index of the second Integer. but there is something wrong in my code. denote the size of the array(n) which (1<=n<=10^5) , and the time limit for this problem is 1 second. Which does not allow me use inner loops. And the array is 1-based.

I will be given an array. It can be sorted or unsorted. If it is unsorted, my task it to check if I can swap two integers that make the array sorted. I read the array then I checked if the array is sorted or not, if it’s not, I made two integers. The first check the number which made the problem from the first and the second integer checks the number which made the problem from the end of the array, then I reversed the sub array from the index of the first integer to the index of the second Integer. but there is something wrong in my code. denote the size of the array(n) which (1<=n<=10^5) , and the time limit for this problem is 1 second. Which does not allow me use inner loops. And the array is 1-based.

This question already has answers here: finding size of char array in C++ (3 answers) How do I determine the size of my array in C? (22 answers) Closed yesterday. I have a char array declared as char input[], and I want to know how to find its size or length. What is the correct […]

In this recent video by Nick Chapsas at the end he commented that the Find method on List<T> was “unoptimized” because the code doesn’t iterate on the Span of the array, but on the array itself:

In this recent video by Nick Chapsas at the end he commented that the Find method on List<T> was “unoptimized” because the code doesn’t iterate on the Span of the array, but on the array itself: