Why does the C library use macros and functions with same name?
I am reading ‘The Standard C Library’ by PJ Plauger which is really interesting. The book explains not only how to USE the library but also how it is implemented.
What situations are appropriate for C# to C interop?
Given that C# has the unsafe keyword, are there situations in which it would still be beneficial to interoperate with C libraries?
Static vs. non-static? (with non-OOP functions)
Although this question has come up before, mine is different because it is not supposed to cover anything OOP but only plain (ANSI) C.
Static vs. non-static? (with non-OOP functions)
Although this question has come up before, mine is different because it is not supposed to cover anything OOP but only plain (ANSI) C.
Static vs. non-static? (with non-OOP functions)
Although this question has come up before, mine is different because it is not supposed to cover anything OOP but only plain (ANSI) C.
Static vs. non-static? (with non-OOP functions)
Although this question has come up before, mine is different because it is not supposed to cover anything OOP but only plain (ANSI) C.
Static vs. non-static? (with non-OOP functions)
Although this question has come up before, mine is different because it is not supposed to cover anything OOP but only plain (ANSI) C.
Function naming design in a C Library
I’m writing a C (c99) library that operates on strings. I’m having a design problem writing functions that will perform in different modes.