Does using Xapian in Django-Haystack enforces GPL?
Consider the following situation:
A possible loophole on the 3-Clause BSD license [closed]
Closed 9 years ago.
Components having GPL and MIT/BSD license but released under MIT license
If a component “A” is under MIT License ,but it contains some GPL files, according to GPL the whole code should be GPL. But the component is released under MIT. Is it possible? If yes/no, on what scenarios can it happen or can get complied
Components having GPL and MIT/BSD license but released under MIT license
If a component “A” is under MIT License ,but it contains some GPL files, according to GPL the whole code should be GPL. But the component is released under MIT. Is it possible? If yes/no, on what scenarios can it happen or can get complied
Copyrights for Open Source projects [duplicate]
This question already has answers here: Copyright notices/disclaimers in source files (5 answers) Closed 9 years ago. Say I’m developing a piece of Open Source software (BSD-Like permissive license) and I write the initial release entirely on my own. After the initial release however I would like numerous other developers to contribute. How do I […]
GPL covers the linguistic data in *spell dictionaries?
There are good annotated vocabulary in {a,i,my}spell dictionaries, giving the lexical class et all.
GPL covers the linguistic data in *spell dictionaries?
There are good annotated vocabulary in {a,i,my}spell dictionaries, giving the lexical class et all.
GPL covers the linguistic data in *spell dictionaries?
There are good annotated vocabulary in {a,i,my}spell dictionaries, giving the lexical class et all.
GPL covers the linguistic data in *spell dictionaries?
There are good annotated vocabulary in {a,i,my}spell dictionaries, giving the lexical class et all.
Mixing BSD + GPL, and dual licensing
I am the sole author of a piece of C++ software which so far I have kept under the GPL license. For uninteresting reasons, I am considering a switch to a MIT/BSD style license. As far as I have understood, this would prevent, in the future, to use any kind of GPL component (library, header, plugin, etc.) in my MIT/BSD licensed software.