Speeds of <> multiplication and division
You can use << to multiply and >> to divide numbers in python when I time them I find using the binary shift way of doing it is 10x faster than dividing or multiplying the regular way.
Speeds of <> multiplication and division
You can use << to multiply and >> to divide numbers in python when I time them I find using the binary shift way of doing it is 10x faster than dividing or multiplying the regular way.
Speeds of <> multiplication and division
You can use << to multiply and >> to divide numbers in python when I time them I find using the binary shift way of doing it is 10x faster than dividing or multiplying the regular way.
Why Num&sizeMinusOne faster than num&(size-1)
I’ve been told that when I have a hash table of size m and m=2^k, I can use the & operator as num & (size-1) instead of num % size, to fit the hashCode to my table size.
Why Num&sizeMinusOne faster than num&(size-1)
I’ve been told that when I have a hash table of size m and m=2^k, I can use the & operator as num & (size-1) instead of num % size, to fit the hashCode to my table size.
Why Num&sizeMinusOne faster than num&(size-1)
I’ve been told that when I have a hash table of size m and m=2^k, I can use the & operator as num & (size-1) instead of num % size, to fit the hashCode to my table size.
Why Num&sizeMinusOne faster than num&(size-1)
I’ve been told that when I have a hash table of size m and m=2^k, I can use the & operator as num & (size-1) instead of num % size, to fit the hashCode to my table size.
Why Num&sizeMinusOne faster than num&(size-1)
I’ve been told that when I have a hash table of size m and m=2^k, I can use the & operator as num & (size-1) instead of num % size, to fit the hashCode to my table size.
When I test out the difference in time between shifting and multiplying in C, there is no difference. Why?
I have been taught that shifting in binary is much more efficient than multiplying by 2^k. So I wanted to experiment, and I used the following code to test this out:
When I test out the difference in time between shifting and multiplying in C, there is no difference. Why?
I have been taught that shifting in binary is much more efficient than multiplying by 2^k. So I wanted to experiment, and I used the following code to test this out: