Next power of 2 for a number (in search for better “bit-twiddling” way)
I just wonder if there exists better (i.e. faster?) way to get the next
power of 2 for a given number than the following one (maybe some
better sort of “bit-twiddling” hack is possible?) …
Next power of 2 for a number (in search for better “bit-twiddling” way)
I just wonder if there exists better (i.e. faster?) way to get the next
power of 2 for a given number than the following one (maybe some
better sort of “bit-twiddling” hack is possible?) …
Next power of 2 for a number (in search for better “bit-twiddling” way)
I just wonder if there exists better (i.e. faster?) way to get the next
power of 2 for a given number than the following one (maybe some
better sort of “bit-twiddling” hack is possible?) …
Next power of 2 for a number (in search for better “bit-twiddling” way)
I just wonder if there exists better (i.e. faster?) way to get the next
power of 2 for a given number than the following one (maybe some
better sort of “bit-twiddling” hack is possible?) …
Why do higher level languages have neither xor nor nand short-circuit operators?
While many higher level languages have bitwise (exclusive or) and bitwise (exclusive and), for instance C, C++, Java, etc. I’m curious why the ( vastly more useful ) logical short-circuit operators don’t have this functionality? Is it simply due to the capacity of being able to concatenate logic through use of “not”?
Why do higher level languages have neither xor nor nand short-circuit operators?
While many higher level languages have bitwise (exclusive or) and bitwise (exclusive and), for instance C, C++, Java, etc. I’m curious why the ( vastly more useful ) logical short-circuit operators don’t have this functionality? Is it simply due to the capacity of being able to concatenate logic through use of “not”?
Why do higher level languages have neither xor nor nand short-circuit operators?
While many higher level languages have bitwise (exclusive or) and bitwise (exclusive and), for instance C, C++, Java, etc. I’m curious why the ( vastly more useful ) logical short-circuit operators don’t have this functionality? Is it simply due to the capacity of being able to concatenate logic through use of “not”?
Why do higher level languages have neither xor nor nand short-circuit operators?
While many higher level languages have bitwise (exclusive or) and bitwise (exclusive and), for instance C, C++, Java, etc. I’m curious why the ( vastly more useful ) logical short-circuit operators don’t have this functionality? Is it simply due to the capacity of being able to concatenate logic through use of “not”?
Speeds of <> multiplication and division
You can use << to multiply and >> to divide numbers in python when I time them I find using the binary shift way of doing it is 10x faster than dividing or multiplying the regular way.
Speeds of <> multiplication and division
You can use << to multiply and >> to divide numbers in python when I time them I find using the binary shift way of doing it is 10x faster than dividing or multiplying the regular way.