A programming language that allows you to define new limits for simple types
Many languages like C++, C#, and Java allow you to create objects that represent simple types like integer or float. Using a class interface you can override operators and perform logic like checking if a value exceeds a business rule of 100.
Should I put the datatype of a class attribute in its name?
Most of my system’s class attributes are just text, but in this case it makes more sense to place this particular class’s attributes into one single hash (from a “keep the source code pretty” aspect). Basically, a list of attributes is returned, and instead of writing a bunch of static attributes for each one, I just loop over them and collect them into a hash.
setting attribute value using another attribute
I have used this to set the host.name…
The advantage of using __attribute__((aligned( )))
I found in more than one SIMD program the instruction __attribute__((aligned(16))) . When I looked for an explanation I found
The advantage of using __attribute__((aligned( )))
I found in more than one SIMD program the instruction __attribute__((aligned(16))) . When I looked for an explanation I found
The advantage of using __attribute__((aligned( )))
I found in more than one SIMD program the instruction __attribute__((aligned(16))) . When I looked for an explanation I found
The advantage of using __attribute__((aligned( )))
I found in more than one SIMD program the instruction __attribute__((aligned(16))) . When I looked for an explanation I found
The advantage of using __attribute__((aligned( )))
I found in more than one SIMD program the instruction __attribute__((aligned(16))) . When I looked for an explanation I found
Should I mark what blocks mean in data-* attributes?
I was writing a webpage today with a comment after the start of every major section. Instead of using a comment, which comes with the bulgy <!-- --> syntax, could I instead put this in a data-* attribute? This would be more for me than anything else, so I don’t want to put it in an id or class, but it would also leave it open for userscripts to more easily parse the page.
Should I mark what blocks mean in data-* attributes?
I was writing a webpage today with a comment after the start of every major section. Instead of using a comment, which comes with the bulgy <!-- --> syntax, could I instead put this in a data-* attribute? This would be more for me than anything else, so I don’t want to put it in an id or class, but it would also leave it open for userscripts to more easily parse the page.