Parallelization by threads vs Parallelization by processes on backend
I used to work with usual sync programming and the archtecture implied
that if you need anything to run a parallel,
you queue it in message system and you would spawn extra process on the same or other VM to consume it : quite mild resource usage spikes,
especially when you limit the number of certain processes on VM.
Parallelization by threads vs Parallelization by processes on backend
I used to work with usual sync programming and the archtecture implied
that if you need anything to run a parallel,
you queue it in message system and you would spawn extra process on the same or other VM to consume it : quite mild resource usage spikes,
especially when you limit the number of certain processes on VM.
Parallelization by threads vs Parallelization by processes on backend
I used to work with usual sync programming and the archtecture implied
that if you need anything to run a parallel,
you queue it in message system and you would spawn extra process on the same or other VM to consume it : quite mild resource usage spikes,
especially when you limit the number of certain processes on VM.