What rationale is used when programming language designers decide what sign the result of modulo operation takes?
Going through Modulo operation (the avenue I entered while exploring the difference between rem and mod) I came across:
What rationale is used when programming language designers decide what sign the result of modulo operation takes?
Going through Modulo operation (the avenue I entered while exploring the difference between rem and mod) I came across:
What rationale is used when programming language designers decide what sign the result of modulo operation takes?
Going through Modulo operation (the avenue I entered while exploring the difference between rem and mod) I came across:
Next power of 2 for a number (in search for better “bit-twiddling” way)
I just wonder if there exists better (i.e. faster?) way to get the next
power of 2 for a given number than the following one (maybe some
better sort of “bit-twiddling” hack is possible?) …
Next power of 2 for a number (in search for better “bit-twiddling” way)
I just wonder if there exists better (i.e. faster?) way to get the next
power of 2 for a given number than the following one (maybe some
better sort of “bit-twiddling” hack is possible?) …
Next power of 2 for a number (in search for better “bit-twiddling” way)
I just wonder if there exists better (i.e. faster?) way to get the next
power of 2 for a given number than the following one (maybe some
better sort of “bit-twiddling” hack is possible?) …
Next power of 2 for a number (in search for better “bit-twiddling” way)
I just wonder if there exists better (i.e. faster?) way to get the next
power of 2 for a given number than the following one (maybe some
better sort of “bit-twiddling” hack is possible?) …
Next power of 2 for a number (in search for better “bit-twiddling” way)
I just wonder if there exists better (i.e. faster?) way to get the next
power of 2 for a given number than the following one (maybe some
better sort of “bit-twiddling” hack is possible?) …
Next power of 2 for a number (in search for better “bit-twiddling” way)
I just wonder if there exists better (i.e. faster?) way to get the next
power of 2 for a given number than the following one (maybe some
better sort of “bit-twiddling” hack is possible?) …
How do you guard against hidden overflows
consider the following: