Verification as QA – makes sense?
Preparing my thesis, I found another interesting discrepancy. While some books say verification it terms of static analysis of work products is quality control (looking for defects), other say it is actually quality assurance because the process of checking is decreasing the probability of real defects when these deliverables will be used for product manufacture.
I hesitate as both seems to be correct: it is a way of checking for defects (deviation from requirements, design flaws etc.) so it looks like quality control, but also it is a process which does not have to be done and if done, can yield better quality.
Showing a grammar is ambiguous
I have the following question taken from a compilers course exam:
Convert grammar into an LL(1) grammar which recognises the same language
I have the following sample question for a compilers exam and wanted to check my solution.
Convert grammar into an LL(1) grammar which recognises the same language
I have the following sample question for a compilers exam and wanted to check my solution.